Posts Tagged ‘Bank’

As Credit Card Changes Roll Out, Watch for Attempts to Raise Fees

2 comments

Credit cards
Image via Wikipedia

RISMEDIA, February 23, 2010—(MCT)—Credit card issuers are now going to have to play by a whole new set of rules that are considered consumer-friendly—but will also cut into some of their traditional sources of revenue.

Don’t expect those companies to take that lying down. Card issuers are expected to spend the next year experimenting with new products and fees—as well as higher interest rates—testing just how much consumers are willing to shell out.

The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act, signed into law in May, is a sweeping overhaul of the card industry and includes provisions to help reduce the amount of interest consumers pay. The bulk of reforms are set to take effect February 22, 2010.

As card issuers prepared for the new rules in recent months, many have raised interest rates on customers—to the dismay of consumer advocates. At the same time, the weak economy and fears of rising defaults caused card companies to cancel accounts and lower credit limits on anyone who appeared risky.

The CARD Act will help many vulnerable consumers. “The biggest winners are consumers who have been taken the most advantage of,” says Josh Frank, senior researcher with the Center for Responsible Lending. These are cardholders who carry balances and have seen their interest rates jump or card terms change for no apparent reason or because they accidentally triggered a late fee, he says.

Consumers who are good managers of credit, though, might be unhappy to find that card issuers may be passing on higher interest rates and fees to them.

Here’s what the next year in credit cards might look like:

Up, up and away: The CARD Act doesn’t prevent issuers from raising interest rates, although there are more restrictions on when and how they can do so. Because card issuers can’t quickly raise rates or change terms on their riskiest customers, they will charge higher interest rates across the board to protect against potential losses, banking experts say. Synovate, which tracks card solicitations, found that offers in the fourth quarter of last year carried an average rate of 13.5%, up from 11.47% a year earlier.

Charge or else: “A lot of the talk around the industry is trying to figure out some of the fees that are going to come,” says Anuj Shahani of Synovate. He says one of the most anticipated: the inactivity fee. Card companies say it costs them money to maintain accounts, and they are starting to slap a fee on unprofitable customers who rarely use their cards.

Welcome back, annual fees: Once common, annual fees now usually appear only on subprime and high-end reward cards, Shahani says. But card issuers are eyeing a revival. Synovate reports that 35% of card offers in the fourth quarter carried an annual fee, the largest percentage in a decade. A year earlier, 23% had annual fees.

Fees for not knowing your limits: Issuers have typically covered customers going over their credit line, but often for a steep price of $35. The CARD Act doesn’t allow over-the-limit fees unless customers opt to have their overcharges covered. Many card issuers are working 24/7 to develop opt-in policies, Brauneis says. Consumer advocates expect a big promotional push by banks to get customers to sign up for this service. Don’t take the bait. “I can’t think of many consumers for whom it would be worth it,” Frank says.

Pricier balancing acts: The standard fee for transferring a balance from one card to another used to be around 3% of the amount transferred, not to exceed $75 or so. But that fee has been going up to 4% and 5% in the past year, and the dollar cap has disappeared. So you can end up paying hundreds of dollars on a transfer. Consumer advocates expect issuers to continue pitching balance transfers to collect the lucrative fees. If you’re tempted to transfer to another card for a lower rate, make sure you know the terms. Card reforms require that promotional rates must last at least six months, so check what your rate will jump to after that.

Skimpier rewards fro some: Card issuers last year watered down rewards, such as reducing points on purchases or trimming cash-back awards. That dilution is expected to continue on basic cards. But issuers will be launching richer reward programs to compete for the most profitable customers: good credit risks who carry a balance, pay interest and occasionally trigger fees.

New law, new products: Issuers have introduced new cards in the past six months, and they say these products have been in the works for a long time. But many seem designed in the spirit of the CARD Act, which aims to make card rules clearer and turn us into better money managers.

(c) 2010, The Baltimore Sun.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

October 2009 Reno Market Stick-built homes in Reno 100

4 comments

MIAMI - JANUARY 06:  A Short Sale sign is seen...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Sales

Below is a summary of the October market conditions

  • • October ended the month with 553 sold transactions up 9% from the prior month. Sales were up 59%

over the same period last year.

  • • Sales Mix:

o Bank Owned unit sales were down in October to 181 as compared to 189 in September. Bank

owned sales represent 33% of the sales, down from 37% in September.

o Short Sales were at 134 in October, up from 125 reported in September. Short sales represent

24% of the mix in October as compared to 25% in September.

o No Special Condition (None) sales increased in October to 198 as compared to 155 in

September. Sales reported as “No Special Condition” represented 36% of the sales, up from

31% reported in September.

Median Price

  • • October 2009 median price was down 3% to $180,000 compared to $186,000 in September 2009.
  • • Median price is defined as the mid-point, half of the sales for the time frame (October) are below and

half are above

Sales by Price Point

  • •The number of sales in the under $150,000 price range has increase for

three consecutive months – October (194 sales), September (178 sales) and August (166 sales). There

was an increase in sales $151,000 – $200,000 for October (134 sales) compared to September (113

sales); $201,000 – $250,000 for October (91 sales) compared to September (94 sales).

  • • 34 closings were over $450,000. In the over $450,000 price range, 6 of the closings were Short Sales

and 6 were Bank Owned.

Pendings

  • • There were 652 new Active Pending sales reported for the month of October, up 3% from the prior

month.

  • • 79% percent of October pendings are distressed (short sale and bank owned).

Listings

  • • 614 new listings were taken in October compared to 709 in September, a 13% decrease.
  • • The percentage of “Distressed” new listings was up 3%. 61% of new October listings were distressed -

225 Short Sales, 147 Bank Owned.

Source  http://rsar.net/uploaded/documents/RSAR%20October2009RenoMonthlyMarketReport.pdf

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Selling A House For Less Than The Full Mortgage . Step 1

Comments Off

NEW YORK - NOVEMBER 24:  A Citibank branch is ...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife
This is a complicated process, and it is always recommended a person talk to a CPA and/or an attorney before trying to sell a home for less than they owe the bank. The bank will usually require that a person be two months delinquent, before the bank will allow someone to start a short sale. Believe it or not the process has become a little simpler this year compared to last year. Now banks seem to be more prepared. They will send out a package that a person will have to fill out. This will have financial information and needs a letter of hardship stating why a person cannot make their mortgage payment. On every short sale the bank will open a case of fraud. This is one on the reason it usually takes so long. Sometimes it is a little easier and less stress on the owner, if a realtor is given permission to talk to the bank.

As a Reno/Sparks real estate consultant I always welcome any comments or questions on the Reno/Sparks real estate or any of the articles I posted.  You can email me directly at  chance at ballard-company.com

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

When Buying a House that is a Short Sale

Comments Off

Schematic representation of short selling in t...
Image via Wikipedia
When buying a short sale, the first thing to understand is that it usually takes a while.  This about 1/3 of the Reno/Sparks real estate market.  The hardest part is getting an answer from the bank (hopefully your only dealing with one). This process can take months and it seems like the bank is in no hurry. This is where it seems most short sales fall apart as the buyer gets tired of waiting. Once the offer finally gets accepted, it will usually take less than 30days.
If dealing with two different banks from a 1st and 2nd mortgage this has the potential of being a real nightmare. The problem usually starts when the bank with the 1st mortgage has a policy that states it only will give the bank with the 2nd mortgage a certain amount no matter what the price. The bank with the 2nd mortgage has a policy that states it needs so much on every dollar that is owed. Which in most cases is a lot more than the 1st wants to give to the 2nd.   With a lot of luck even this obstacle and be cleared (sometimes).

Being a Reno/Sparks real estate consultant I always appreciate any question or comments on the Reno/Sparks real estate or any of the articles I post.

Send all questions to chance@ballard-company.com

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

“Short Sale”

Comments Off

Schematic representation of short selling in t...
Image via Wikipedia
A Short Sale is when the bank agrees to discount a loan balance due to an economic or financial hardship on the part of the home owner. The home owner sells the property for less than the outstanding balance of the loan, and turns over the proceeds of the sale to the lender. Usually the bank is in the process of foreclosing on the property due to the current owner defaulting on their loan and both the current owner and the bank that holds the note (mortgage) are involved with the process of selling the home and signing the necessary documents and disclosures.  This about a third of the Reno/Sparks real estate market.
There is usually more time and ‘red tape’ involved with purchasing a Short Sale…especially if there is a 1st and a 2nd mortgage with two different lenders. Those can be a nightmare waiting to happen if you’re impatient. In other words don’t be in a hurry to close escrow on a Short Sale because it could take months. This is due to the sellers/homeowners must submit a “short sale package” to the bank that must be approved in order to consummate a short sale. This is where the timely process comes in, because if these packages are incomplete or submitted incorrectly (lenders requirements for their submission process & packages vary) the homeowner & agent can expect either significant time delays.
Highly recommend any Seller trying a short sale see a lawyer and an accountant to help avoid any delinquent judgments and/or tax implications.

Being a Reno/Sparks real estate consultant I always appreciate any question or comments on the Reno/Sparks real estate or any of the articles I post.

Send all questions to chance@ballard-company.com

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]